Suppose the CDF excess indeed originates from a 300 GeV mother resonance. If that resonance is produced by gluon-gluon collisions then the LHC should be able to see the excess already in 200 pb-1, which is the amount of data used in the most recent analyses.
If, on the other hand, that resonance is produced in quark-antiquark collisions then we need to wait for 1 inverse femtobarn to see a significant excess at the LHC.
この記事で理解出来ていない部分は、
返信削除As for the LHC, ,,, However this means nothing: ATLAS simply had no right to see the hypothetical CDF bump in their 2010 data.
バックグラウンドがLHCのほうが大きい、ルミノシティはLHCのほうが小さい。これはわかる。このことから結論めいたことが言えないのは分かった。
Suppose the CDF excess indeed originates from a 300 GeV mother resonance. If that resonance is produced by gluon-gluon collisions then the LHC should be able to see the excess already in 200 pb-1, which is the amount of data used in the most recent analyses.
If, on the other hand, that resonance is produced in quark-antiquark collisions then we need to wait for 1 inverse femtobarn to see a significant excess at the LHC.
この２つが？？？
とはいえ、シグマの問題だけではなくて、バックグラウンドの評価（グルオン-グルオンの衝突の影響）について明確になっていないことが最も大きいのだと思う。
やはり、D0のデータとLHCの今年のデータを解析しないと結論は出ないのではなかろうか。